service finder    contact us    glossary    site map    FAQs    employment
our service areas    market fundamentals    decisionSupport    products & services    our experience    about us
Case Studies
Affiliations
White Papers
Articles
 
Articles

ERCOT 2010 – Preparing for the Nodal Market Structure

By Tom Allen, Director, Government and Regulatory Affairs, GDF SUEZ NA


Finalizing the Market Structure: The Future is Here

We’ve come a long way since 2002, when the competitive retail market opened in Texas and enabled customer choice for over 6.5 million consumers in ERCOT. And it’s now been almost seven years of progress since September 2003, when the PUCT ordered ERCOT to develop a nodal market structure for increased system efficiencies.
 
The idea was simple: To provide Texas consumers in the competitive electricity market the best delivery system possible so consumers would have more choices in products and prices while reducing costly congestion on the transmission system and improving system reliability. The idea of 2003 is becoming a reality today.

Milestones

April 1, 2010, was a milestone in the preparation for a new energy future in Texas as nodal day-ahead market trials began. With less than 230 days remaining until the “go live” date for nodal, over 256 market participants out of 276 – representing 99.9 percent of ERCOT generation – have qualified for the market trials, and the integrated trials with full functionality are scheduled to begin May 1.

And in an effort to optimize the nodal structure and provide retail consumers the ability to make informed decisions about their own energy usage, new metering technologies are being researched, tested and deployed. ONCOR and CenterPoint Energy have now installed over 1.13 million of their planned 6 million Advanced Metering Systems (AMS) to retail consumers in their respective service territories.

Leadership

The seven-year development of the nodal market design has had some expected political and regulatory challenges and debates. Given the complexity and magnitude of technical issues, it takes strong leadership to get the job done. ERCOT’s 2009 addition of a no-nonsense Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer sent a signal to the legislature and market participants that nodal will be “on-line and on time.” And Chairman Barry T. Smitherman’s recent announcement that he will remain at the pro-competition, pro-consumer PUCT and not seek the new ERCOT CEO position should add a sense of regulatory certainty to the implementation of the nodal market design.

Considering where regulators, elected officials, consumers and stakeholders began in 2003, we have now successfully run 95 yards on the 100-yard dash to nodal. In other words, we are almost there.

Challenges Remain - 8 Months to Nodal

Retail and wholesale market Issues will continue to be argued in the stakeholder process at ERCOT and in rulemaking before the PUCT. Ongoing debates before policymakers will focus on matters surrounding wind integration, the design of new ancillary services, resource adequacy, non-wind renewable technology carve-outs for technologies and, most importantly, who pays for it all. It is likely that more issues will be added to the regulatory policy mix, too.

On a political note, beginning in May 2010, the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission, a 12-member body of elected officials from the Texas legislature, will hold hearings on the effectiveness of both ERCOT and the PUCT. Given earlier debates about the costs and benefits of nodal, this scheduled review of state agencies and entities (each reviewed every 12 years) will certainly increase public awareness during the summer, attracting media attention to the ongoing transition to a successful nodal market.

A Better Energy Future

But Texas consumers, stakeholders, policymakers and regulators need to stay on course. Few can argue with the benefits that the competitive electricity market has provided consumers in terms of the breadth of choice, pricing options and attracting new investment and innovative technologies for the future.

Since 1998, the Texas competitive electricity market has brought over $40 billion in new generation technologies and reduced air emissions, thereby making Texas cleaner through increased efficiencies. Vigorous competition has led a to robust retail market; now, over 29 different providers offer more than 138 different rate plans for consumers. And according to the Annual Baseline Assessment of Choice in Canada and the United States (ABACCUS), Texas has ranked No. 1 in commercial/industrial retail markets for the past two years and No. 1 in residential market design for the past three years.

The hard work and preparation is paying off, and consumers will continue to see benefits from a competitive electricity market with a more efficient nodal design.

Back to Articles