service finder    contact us    glossary    site map    FAQs    employment
our service areas    market fundamentals    decisionSupport    products & services    our experience    about us
Case Studies
Affiliations
White Papers
Articles
 
Articles

National - Shale Gas an Essential Component of the Nation's Future

By David Coffman, Vice-President, Marketing, GDF SUEZ Energy Resources NA


One of the more significant issues to surface in the ongoing U.S. energy policy debate is the emergence – and importance – of shale formations as a key source of natural gas.

Although shale gas production dates back to the 1820s, advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have dramatically increased its potential. This has provided the country with a vital weapon in the fight for energy independence, while at the same time putting a legislative, regulatory, and political spotlight on the processes by which the gas is extracted.

In that by some estimates these shale “plays” have enough recoverable resources to meet U.S. natural gas needs for 116 years, the nation’s ability to successfully manage concerns related to production will have a major impact on the direction of the American energy future.

A New Land Rush

Shale gas has always been a part of the domestic production landscape. In 1821, the first shale gas well was drilled in Fredonia, New York, and activity continued until 1859, when the volume from conventional gas reservoirs substantially overtook that from the hard, non-porous rock formations.

Production continued into the 20th century, as geologists and wildcatters looked for better, more economical ways to maximize the potential of gas-bearing shale. When they eventually found the right drilling technique – and rising natural gas prices made those processes commercially viable – a “land rush” that had been slow getting out of the starting gate prior to the 1980s suddenly took off.

Gas-rich shale plays span the country, from New York to Texas, Montana to Alabama. But for the most part, attention has largely concentrated on four primary formations: Barnett, in the Fort Worth Basin of North-Central Texas; Fayetteville, in Northern Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma; Haynesville, in Northern Louisiana and Eastern Texas; and Marcellus, which spans six states and extends from parts of Tennessee into Southern New York.

Barnett Shale
“The source of America’s (energy) transformation lies in the Barnett Shale,” writes The Economist. More than 10,000 wells have been drilled in the 5,000-square-mile formation, whose natural gas content – 300 to 350 standard cubic feet per ton – is among the highest of any play in North America. With an estimated 327 trillion cubic feet of gas and 44 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable resources, the Barnett Shale today accounts for 7 percent of U.S. natural gas supplies.

Fayetteville Shale
The Fayetteville play is roughly double the size of Barnett, though the gas content of 60 to 220 standard cubic feet per ton is smaller. However, production in the region has accelerated significantly in recent years, increasing from 13 wells in 2004 to more than 1,000 today, making it “one of the most active plays in the U.S.,” according to the Department of Energy. Fayetteville has an estimated 52 trillion cubic feet of gas, with 41.6 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable resources.

Haynesville Shale
Haynesville emerged in 2007 as a potentially significant source of shale gas. Although it may take a few years to determine the play’s true development possibilities, estimates of the formation’s gas content are as high as 330 standard cubic feet per ton – up in the Barnett Shale range. Moreover, Haynesville’s estimated 251 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable resources is more than five times that of the Texas play.

Marcellus
Right now, this is where much of the U.S. shale gas activity is concentrated. The most expansive play in the country, it covers 96,000 square miles. When drilling began in the early 2000s, estimates were that the formation held 1.9 trillion cubic feet of gas. Further study pushed that projection to 500 trillion cubic feet. More recent estimates put the potential at 1,500 trillion cubic feet, of which 262 trillion are recoverable, and it is widely expected that those figures will be further adjusted upward. According to one study, Marcellus may contain 2,445 trillion cubic feet of reserves in place and has the potential to yield the equivalent of a 20-year supply of natural gas for the country.

Proven Technologies Facilitate Development

There is no question that the combination of two oilfield techniques – horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing – has opened the door of opportunity for shale gas development. Along with the economies of scale that followed greater exploration and extraction, The Economist reports, “improvements in techniques have halved the production costs of shale gas, making it cheaper even than some conventional sources.”

In the hydraulic fracturing process, a liquid composed primarily of sand and water is pumped into the shale formation, causing cracks or fractures. Generally used in formations deep below the earth’s surface (5,000 to 20,000 feet down) that have low porosity and permeability, it helps create a path that allows trapped natural gas to flow up the borehole for recovery. The ability to use horizontal drilling techniques – in which a bit is inserted vertically and then curves horizontally, allowing for multiple fractures and multiple wells from a single platform – further optimizes production.

Interestingly, for all of the recent news media attention that has focused on hydraulic fracturing, the process is hardly new. It was used in industrial operations as early as 1903 and was introduced to oil and gas production in 1949. Currently a mainstay of the global energy industry, hydraulic fracturing has been used to stimulate more than 1 million wells in the United States; 90 percent of U.S. natural gas wells rely on fracturing.

Concerns Over Water

With the increased awareness of shale oil development, there has been a parallel increase in the visibility of fracturing. Predictably, the added scrutiny has raised concerns, most of them related to the environment.

The core issue is the content of the so-called “fracking liquid” pumped into the rock and whether it can contaminate water supplies. Although specific compounds used in specific operations can vary, for the most part the fluids are 99.5 percent fresh water. The Department of Energy explains:

"The fracturing fluids used for gas shale stimulations consist primarily of water but also include a variety of additives…A typical fracture treatment will use very low concentrations of between 3 and 12 additive chemicals depending on the characteristics of the water and the shale formation being fractured."

Critics have pointed to a handful of incidents in which they suggest fracturing has tainted the local water resources. But independent investigations have never been able to link the incidents in question to fracking fluids, and past studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Ground Water Protection Council have concluded the process possesses no risk.

However, the EPA recently undertook a new study to determine if fracturing poses a danger to human health and water quality. Also, legislation is pending in Congress that would bring hydraulic fracturing under the regulatory umbrella of the Safe Drinking Water Act rather than leave oversight to the states alone.

Vast Potential

Although the techniques by which natural gas is developed from shale may be up for debate, there is no question that unconventional plays will have an enormous role in the U.S. energy future.

An estimated 385 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas exists in the lower 48 U.S. states, and the consulting firm ICF forecasts that unconventional shale gas production – which also includes tight gas and coalbed methane – will increase from 42 percent of total U.S. production in 2007 to 64 percent in 2020. A March 2010 IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates report calls shale gas a potential “game changer.”

Of course, none of this factors in the environmental benefits of natural gas, which is the cleanest of all fossil fuels and results in reduced greenhouse gas emissions. So if concerns over process can be objectively assessed and addressed, it is clear that natural gas from unconventional sources will likely be an essential component of the nation’s future strategies for environmental, energy, and national security.

Back to Articles